A move to make Greater Manchester the second region in England to enter strict Tier 3 lockdown restrictions, provoked an extraordinary backlash from local leaders.
Boris Johnson’s aide Eddie Lister confirmed to local leaders on a Zoom call on Thursday morning that the region was set to be placed in the highest tier, according to Paul Waugh from the Huffington Post.
However, health secretary Matt Hancock said “discussions are ongoing” with local leaders on moving areas classed as high to very high, and thanked the leadership in Liverpool for their “public service and cross-party teamwork” in agreeing such an increase in the alert level.
Reacting to the ongoing talks, Oldham West and Royton MP Jim McMahon said that Downing Street refused to tell MPs whether Greater Manchester was being placed in Tier 3 and described the meeting as “pointless”.
The Govt’s offer:
Tier 2 – what we’ve had for over 2 months now but which hasn’t got on top of infections and is very hard on hospitality
Tier 3 – widespread destitution for an unspecified period of time
— Jonathan Reynolds (@jreynoldsMP) October 15, 2020
The Labour MP tweeted: “The COVID-19 meeting with government is over and it was absolutely pointless.
“No consultation, no evidence was shared on the likely impact of further measures, no economic analysis and no enhanced financial support.
“Wouldn’t even tell us if Greater Manchester is being placed in Tier 3 lockdown!”
Labour MP Lucy Powell echoed the report, adding on Twitter: “There was unanimous anger on this call at process, evidence base for proposals and economic support.”
Jonathan Reynolds, the shadow work and pensions secretary and also a Greater Manchester MP, described Tier 3 as “widespread destitution for an unspecified period of time”.
Speaking in the Commons this morning, the health secretary said: “In other areas currently in the second tier where discussions are ongoing, no further decisions have yet been made but we need to make rapid progress.”
.@BorisJohnson aide Eddie Lister has just told Greater Manchester leaders on a Zoom call that the area is indeed going into Tier 3 “Very High” covid risk category, source says.
— Paul Waugh (@paulwaugh) October 15, 2020
It comes days after Liverpool became the first area to be placed under the highest tier of the new system.
Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham has been having talks with No 10, having signalled resistance to pressure to enter Tier 3 despite soaring infection rates.
It means the city faces having to close its bars, gyms and betting shops, while pubs will only be able to serve alcohol to people sitting down for a “substantial meal”.
Burnham previously said the region could legally challenge any decision by ministers to put it into Tier 3 restrictions.
He told an online press conference on Wednesday that if Greater Manchester was put into Tier 3 it would be “by imposition, not consent”.
He added: “We are law abiding people, we would respect the law of the land.
“But we would consider other routes, legal routes, where we could protect our many thousands of residents who are going to be left in severe hardship in the run up to Christmas.
“We would not just leave them in the lurch, we would try and support them and that would include any legal action we could take on their behalf.”
Watch: How will England’s three-tier local lockdown system work?
This morning, Calum Semple, professor of outbreak medicine at the University of Liverpool and a member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), told BBC Breakfast that, in his opinion, Manchester needed to go into Tier 3 measures, as did other regions.
He added: “There is always going to be some friction between the focus on the numbers of case, and the need to keep the economy going, but from a purely academic point of view where I’m coming from, if you allow the numbers to rise it inevitably has an impact on the economy because you start to lose the capacity to deliver these other essential services.”
Burnham said a national circuit-breaker lockdown, which Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer called for on Tuesday, would be a “better and fairer way” of tackling the pandemic.
He told a press conference: “I think that (a circuit-breaker) is more likely to succeed for three reasons.
“It is being done nationally so there isn’t that opportunity for a neighbouring area to bring cases back into a Tier 3 area.”
He said it would also be beneficial because regions would get national support and would bring cases down further to allow local areas to “reset” test and trace.
Coronavirus: what happened today
Click here to sign up to the latest news and information with our daily Catch-up newsletter